TOK Essay on Mathematician\'s Knowledge Versus Scientist\'s Knowledge

hypothesis of Knowledge (TOK) Essay\n\nHow does the mathematicians intimacy differ from that of the scientist?\n\nThis interrogative implies discussing how the knowledge acquired by mathematicians differs from that acquired by scientists.\n\nDefining mathematics is neer easy. Some claim it is an art, others that it is a science, yet others that it is a tool. mathematics is also hard to do on the map of mankind endeavors. Should it be placed by the natural sciences, or does it run low together with philosophy among the gay sciences? These questions arise from other, more foundational questions: What tell of knowledge does mathematics support? What distinguishes the knowledge concerned with mathematics? And How does the mathematicians knowledge differ from that of the scientist? I am non intending to answer both these questions, simply am leaving the actor questions open to concentrate on the latter, on how the mathematical knowledge differs from scientific knowledge.\n\ nThe some prompt answer that first pops into your heed is the fact that, while all the sciences are desperately seek to describe what already is in the factual world, mathematics is entirely concerned with itself and the rather pure world built up around it. We only force into it what founders horse sense, thwarting all cover and incorrect knowledge as erroneous, as non-mathematics. The scientists hind end non do this. However secret and sometimes irrational and maniac(predicate) the recent observations within quantum natural philosophy may seem, we cannot simply drop them. Until better explanations are presented we take for to stick to the ones we have because it makes most sense.\n\nMathematicians rarely deal with what makes sense and what does not. A mathematical scheme is either correct or is not. Either the theory is turn out to serve, or it is quickly discarded. mathematics has no room for doubts. blush if all mathematicians stand up and say We do not unde rstand this. if it is possible to come on it, it is a fact.\n\nWhich leads us to the play of acquiring knowledge. Scientists usually work by means of observation. They observe, and beget conclusions from what occurred. For the knowledge is already on that point, hold to be harvested. Mathematicians, on the contrary, regain knowledge by making it up as they go. mathematics is never there until we make it up. With sciences, if there is nothing to observe, no new knowledge can be obtained. In mathematics, however, if there is nothing to start with, it is kind of easy...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.