Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Prevailing Wars in the 21st Century

As soon as the time struck twelve on the eve of January 2001, the sky change with gleaming fireworks. It was the start of the twenty-first century, a new millennia, and the forgiving polishedization was celebrating the peak of its prosperity, which was gener on the wholey brought upon by technical marvels of the ult two centuries. Yet equitable nine months later, a terrorist snipe would mark the beginning of a new chapter in publics bloody history. later the attack, militaries of the most supposedly puissant farmings would mobilize to quell what they aphorism as a panic to atomic number 18na peace. Within months, a well off nation became, socially and economically, almost just crippled, and another plunged back into civil war. Millions, in the aftermath of the family line 11 attack, were made to bear at the hands of a few miscreants actions and at the voice communication of even fewer politicians.\nWars encounter been an integral, unavoidable aspect of man soci eties since their existence. Regardless of all the\nadvancements serviceman have made thence far, world peace seems resembling a distant dream. Our technological breakthroughs have helped us draw near materially, but failed to foster what we maybe need most: clean ethics. No other lifetime beings treat one of their testify as brutally as humans do. Although science propels the world at present, and has no formula for peace, and was neer meant to provide a righteous upbringing. It can be apply for progress, but it can be used just as much for destruction. The Japanese and Germans, with all their technological superiority, chose a lane of annihilation. One can argue, I suppose, that science made them in like manner arrogant.\nNevertheless, the question remains: why do wars exist today when most of us, if not all, are well aware that all the\nresources wasted on state of war could be diverted somewhere more productive? Appropriating military machine expenditures\ninto e liminating poverty & illiteracy, for example, would be a much more paid venture. Do the antagonists\nnot under...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.