Monday, April 1, 2019
How Increased Portion Sizes Effect Obesity Drama Essay
How Increased Portion Sizes Effect fleshiness Drama EssayWould you like to supersize that? Its a simple question asked to patrons at some national betting nutrient chains. Its actually quite a deal, for cents more you can cast up the amount of food and drink you ar given. What if by increasing the amount of food you were eating actually growing your chances of developing severe health issues? A persons risk for developing many life-threatening health conditions can be measured by how a great deal excess gamey is stored in their fat cells. The United States has had an influx in the itemize of individuals who argon over pack could supersizing be to blame? eon on that point atomic number 18 other ca expenditures for weight gain, increase pct sizes combined with inertia deal had a direct effect on the growing corpulency cases.Obesity is a condition in which an individuals body accumulates and stores more fat than what is considered healthy. To determine the amount of f at stored in a persons body, a bole Mass Index (BMI) number is calculated. The formula for determining a persons BMI is the weight (in pounds) divided by the height (in inches) squared multiplying that number by a conversion factor of 703. For case, to determine the BMI number for a person who weighs cl pounds and is 65 inches tall, the formula would be 150 (65) 2 x 703 = 24.96. A BMI range of beneath 18.5 is considered underweight, the normal range is amidst 18.5 and 24.9, while 25 29.9 is considered overweight, finally a BMI score of 30 and above is categorized as obese. (CDC, About BMI for Adults, 2009) The BMI calculations are lone(prenominal) one small part in determining a persons health risks in relation to weight issues. This calculation does not affiance into account the difference between muscle and fat weight, so it is workable for someone to receive a higher BMI number nevertheless not have a high body-fat content be display case of muscle weight. It is importan t to bear off this into account when calculating ones body business deal index number. One of the firstborn actions taken by a technician when a patient is seen by a physician is they are asked to step on a scale. Then they are either asked how tall they are, or are physically measured. It is not a coincidence that these are the two measurements needed to calculate an individuals body mass index. The BMI ranges are based on a documented relationship between body weight, disease and death and are used as a tool to identify increased risk for diseases and health conditions.Obesity is a contri only ifing factor for several severe health conditions and diseases, most of which have proven to be life-threatening. These conditions include hypertension, type 2 diabetes, coronary disembodied spirit disease, stroke, gallbladder disease, sleep apnea and respiratory problems, dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis, and some cancers to include endometrial, breast and, colon cancer. Even though being overweight contributes directly to the development of such(prenominal) severe health problems, the rates of diagnosed cases of obesity have steadily increased over the last(prenominal) two decades. (CDC, Overweight and Obesity, 2007)According to the Centers of illness go steady and Prevention, during the outgoing 20 years there has been a dramatic increase in obesity in the United States. (2007) The CDC collected information on the rise in obesity through the CDCs Behavioral Risk chemical element Surveillance System, (BRFSS). In 1985, the CDC had gathered information for only 21 states which showed no more than 14% of each states universe of discourse diagnosed with obesity. In 2008, the CDC collected data on all 50 states of which Colorado held the lowest percentage of obesity cases at 15-19% however all other states were recorded between 20-30% of their population were severely overweight. (CDC, Overweight and Obesity, 2007) Andrew Cates, Portion distortion analysis of foo d bunch size to aid in weight control (2003), states According to the U.S. surgical incision of Agriculture, the average number of large calories Americans eat each day has risen from 1,854 to 2,002 during the past 20 years. That increase of 148 calories per day works out to 15 pounds of pointless weight each year. (2003) This data shows Americans are eating more directly than what they were twenty years ago. However, the increased calorie phthisis alone is only part of the bewilder for the increased obesity in the United States.While other causes for obesity include genetics, disease, and medication side effects consume large hazards of food without expending enough energy to compensate is considered to be the root cause of weight gain. For example, a normal meal from a popular fast-food restaurant consists of a cheeseburger with condiments (760 calories), medium fries (360 calories) and a 22 fluid ounce sluttish drink (200 calories) for a minimum amount of 1320 calories ingested. An average adult weighing 180 pounds would have to walk at a pace of four miles per hour for 4.02 hours or run at a pace of 6.7 miles per hour for 1.6 hours to burn off the calories ingested at this typical meal. However, the average American does not maintain physical activities for extended periods after each meal therefore not exerting enough energy to richly expend the large number of calories. This results in excess calories to be in the bodys fat cells, thus causing an increase in weight. Consider the nutrition of a professional athlete, these individuals can take in roughly 12000 calories per day, but maintain a lean muscle mass and body strength. They use every calorie ingested for fuel during physical training. For the average human, this high calorie diet is highly dangerous. While the increased consumption of calories is a orbiculate trend, the supersizing of fast food menu items has made the obesity epidemic worse for those living in the United States. (Cal orieLab, 2007)Lisa R. Young, PhD, RD and Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH conducted and documented a drive titled The office of Expanding Portion Sizes to the US Obesity Epidemic. This study compared past food ingredients to those currently sold to document historical changes. One example of the effect supersizing has had on the typical caloric intake was the comparison of soft drink sizes served at a McDonalds in the United States versus those sold at McDonalds in the United Kingdom. Notably, the sizes of chain fast-food portions in Europe are littler than those in the United States. McDonalds Extra Large soda portions in London, Rome, and capital of Ireland weigh the same as the US Large. (Young and Nestle, 2002) The study also say the largest size of McDonalds fries sold in the United States in 1998-1999 contained 610 calories, during that beat the United Kingdoms largest fry size contained 446 calories. While the serving sizes at fast food restaurants in America seem to be larger in comparison to other countries, this does not mean the restaurants are the only cause for Americas increases in obesity cases.Are restaurants largely at fault for the increase obesity rates in the United States? Because of data on portion sizes, it wouldnt be incorrect to place some blame on the food marketing industry. But this industry runs off supply-and- demand, if there was no demand for larger portion sizes theoretically the sizes would be reduced. Additionally, when faced with the increased portion sizes, consumers are more likely to ignore the recommended sizes and will attempt to ingest what they are served. In addition to high-calorie meals, additional excess calories are taken in throughout the day by snack foods, sodas, flavored waters, candy, and even gum. just about everything taken into a persons body through consumption contains a number of calories. As discussed before, the ingestion of excess calories is not what causes the build-up in body fat, but rather the lac k of energy used to expend the calories.So does supersized food lead to supersized people? This seems to be the case for the average person who dines on large portions without expending the needed energy to burn through the redundant calories. While there are other causes for weight gain, increased portion sizes combined with inactivity have had a direct effect on the growing obesity cases. The amount of food ingested is only part of the cause for the obesity epidemic, combine it with the decrease in daily activity and what is left over(p) is the formula for an unhealthy, possibly fatal medical condition that takes years to overcome. Would you cool off like to supersize that?ReferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.(2007).Overweight and Obesity Home.Retrieved from http//www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). About BMI for Adults. Retrieved from http//www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/index.htmlCalorieLab. (2 007). Burger King Calorie Counter. Retrieved from http//calorielab.com/restaurants/burger-king/3Cates, A. (2003). Portion torture Analysis of Food Portion Size to Aid in metric weight unit Control. Retrieved from http//findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0826/is_6_19/ai_111111456/Rolls, B.J., Roe, L.S., Meengs J.S.(2007).The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days.Department of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University.Retrieved from http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17557991Young, L.R. Nestle M. (2002). The Contribution of Expanding Portion Sizes to the US Obesity Epidemic. Retrieved from http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447051/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.